Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TV Photog (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 05:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TV Photog

TV Photog (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Since the last AfD two years ago, the article has not been expanded, nor have reliable sources been added. Two websites are given as sources, which have "TV Photographer" or "TV Photog" in their title; but that doesn't even define the subject. Some seem to understand the term as a colloquial abbreviation for Videographer (then it should be a redirect), other say it's an independent concept. Both views actually appear in the last AfD. But how should we decide, without a reliable source? -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 11:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. About time. --Alvestrand 12:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I think that if this is an independent concept, decent sources would exist. It is shorthand for "photographer". --Stormbay 18:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.