Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOE (award winner)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TOE (award winner)

TOE (award winner) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• Orphaned article, with no references or examples of mainstream use. Looks more like neologistic listcruft. - Tiswas^(t) 11:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Odd. Delete unless sourced. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• TOE (Take Out of Encyclopedia) A random acronym that gives no sources noting or explaining its use? I'll pass. -- Kicking222 15:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete it appears to be a neologism with sources unlikely to be found. Possibly a protologism. Jay32183 02:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.