Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydvetlish

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE

[edit] Sydvetlish

Delete - This appears to be a constructed language created by a 13 years old. Only two ghits, both to the language's homepage. All internal links there are dead, so that there is no proof whatsoever that the language actually exists. Whichever criteria we choose to decide whether a conlang warrants an entry or not, this one is certainly not going to make it. IJzeren Jan 06:38, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

• Weak delete : This page has little content. Manik Raina 08:53, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Strong delete, this page has sub-stub levels of content about what is apparently an abandoned conlang. Average Earthman 12:12, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete under WP:CSD A1/A3/vanity/spam/verifiability/original research/should I continue? --IByte 14:05, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above, specifically vanity. --Several Times 14:35, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per above: vanity, nonverifiable. --Jim Henry | Talk 15:32, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Though I would vote to keep if the link were not broken - I don't care how notable or "worthwhile" it is, if it's just a page by itself, and as mentioned elsewhere I don't think verifiability applies because it's self-defining... but it ought to *be* described, either in the article or the link, and this doesn't meet that. --Saizai 15:32, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, per IJzeren Jan. --Randy 20:29, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Conlangs are very rarely notable, and this article has hardly any content. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:50, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.