Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweety the Chick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as nobody has shown article has any reliable sources, will recreate as a redirect to Jamba!#Jamba! characters. Davewild (talk) 11:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sweety the Chick

Sweety the Chick (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not appear to have any reliable, non-trivial sources that are not self-published. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete 24,000 Yahoo hits--but not a reliable source among them. Blueboy96 16:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • I'd think that it is notable as a Jamba! character, but has no independent notability. A redirect might be the answer.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 16:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep The article needs work, but this was really well know advert in the UK, one of the first of its type to advertise ringtones. I think personally, it established a cultural event, mostly because everybody complained about the incessant repeats. Clean the article. scope_creep (talk) 17:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - file down to short stub, or redirect to here. Rudget.talk 17:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete-No reliable sources, outside of self-promotions.---Iconoclast Horizon 23:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iconoclast.horizon (talk • contribs)
  • Delete lacking sources and is a non-notable character in an advertising campaign - not even the most notable character in the campaign which featured Crazy Frog. MLA (talk) 11:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Used to be played on many, many, many television channels and is very well-known. Esteffect (talk) 21:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
WP:N states that 'notability' is not synonymous with, among other things, fame or popularity.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:28, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.