Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swan & Sugarloaf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Swan & Sugarloaf

Swan & Sugarloaf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Text does not explain why the pub is notable. SilkTork 18:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - no assertion of notability. Search of Google news sees mentions of the pub but nothing that seems to be about the pub. -- Whpq 16:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Couldn't find reliable sources with the pub as the topic. --Wafulz 01:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stoic atarian 07:52, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Merge with Brighton Road, may have some local notability. Bjrobinson 12:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Not too much to see here! Duke of Whitstable 23:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.