Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superiorman Red Nudist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete, article provides insufficient context to assess its encyclopaedic merit. Guy (Help!) 18:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Superiorman Red Nudist

Superiorman Red Nudist (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I'm pretty convinced that this is a hoax. I cannot verify any of it and honestly it reads very much like a joke. Delete per WP:V and WP:N and thus WP:BIO since no assertion of notability is made. MartinDK 16:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete I can't say if it is hoax for sure, but per WP:FICT there shouldn't be a separate page for a character who apparently appears in 2 pages of a book. I would say speedy redirect, but since I doubt this is a likely search term and we have hoax concerns I say delete it. --Daniel J. Leivick 17:00, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.