Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperShadow (3)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 06:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SuperShadow

SuperShadow (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable person. Fails WP:BIO as a person, WP:WEB as a website. Entire page is original research and extremely negative. Chardish 01:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - unless one can provide verifiable references (none of which I can find). All that OR... the_undertow talk 02:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per prior AFD discussions here and here. TheRealFennShysa 02:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Template:!comment - Consensus can change, and surviving one AfD does not grant immunity from future AfDs. Besides, two years is an eternity in wikitime, and I'd like to think that our standards have improved since 2005, when Wikipedia was just beginning to attract national attention. - Chardish 02:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:WEB and WP:N and WP:V, as it is has no external indepedant significant sources that verify anything that is said nor do any of the external indepedant sources establish notibility in anyway. Can't justify that he is internet phenomenon with no proof at all. Majority (if not everything) is taken from primary source. NPOV problems also.--Dacium 04:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Dacium. Having Internet notoriety doesn't grant one notability. JuJube 04:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

*Delete. If he refuses to release info about himself, how do we make an article? Also, a Comment; TheRealFennShysa has failed WP:COI here (article history) This vote has been withdrawn ~ G1ggy! blah, blah, blah 06:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per Dacium. Sr13 (T|C) 07:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails virtually every applicable guideline/policy. Being hated doesn't make you notable. --RaiderAspect 12:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete Wookieepedia already was a good article, but this is fancruft. ¿ςפקιДИτς! ☺ ☻ 14:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • DeleteViolates WP:BIOand WP:WEBShindo9Hikaru 23:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, this person is non-notable outside Star Wars fans (and they already have their own wiki for such things). -- Mithent 13:30, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.