Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subdrop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Pending sources. If they are found, I will consider undeletion or relisting the AFD. Please contact me on my talk page. W.marsh 18:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Subdrop

This seems to be to completely original research; half essay and half instructions. The term itself does seem to turn up on blogs, but I could not find anything that looked like a reliable source. I think that there is a possibility for an appropriate article by this name, but this is not that article. If it were gutted of all problematic stuff it would just a dictionary definition. And that wouldn't belong here either. I think we should delete this without prejudice of recreation if any reliable sources are found in the future.BirgitteSB 21:06, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Strange article....Keeper | 76 21:56, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOR and WP:V. Anytime an article says "All of the information on this subject is anecdotal," that's a bad sign. —  Satori Son 01:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into aftercare (BDSM), unless there are specific sources found. The "anecdotal" comment is a frank admission that there is no known physiological or experimental basis, but that applies to a great deal of human concerns including sexuality; it doesn't mean there are no sources of information for the term or the feeling. Agreed, though, that if no source can be found at all it will have to be merged or deleted. 04:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• Hold* I will look for information sources as best I can, though I am only a passer by, give me about a week. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.8.54.138 (talk) 08:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.