Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stpm cut-off university

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There was a clear consensus for deletion. In addition, the article has severe problems; it is unsourced and lacks the necessary context to understand what it is about. However, all is not lost because the content is already at Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia. I am not adopting the suggestion of a redirect because it does not seem a likely search term. TerriersFan (talk) 04:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Stpm cut-off university

My prod was deleted, so.. yeah, this article seems to me to be very unencyclopedic, it doesn't actually explain what 'stpm' is and the external links are all to freewebs. It just seems to be a list of grade boundaries, which isn't really something that we need an article on. -- Naerii · plz create stuff 11:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete and maybe even WP:CSD#A1 as lacking sufficient context. The article does not give sufficient information to establish what it's about. Guy (Help!) 11:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 14:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Un-Encyclopedic... trying to think of something else to say but.... un-encyclopedic is the only thing that comes to mind really.... (scratching head)... --Pmedema (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

• Sometimes there is no policy to cite, sometimes things just blatantly don't belong here :P -- Naerii · plz create stuff 17:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment - the AFD is malformed. There is no AFD notice on the article. -- Whpq (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Bah, I could have sworn twinkle did that ! :( -- Naerii · plz create stuff 13:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia -- Whpq (talk) 13:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Even picking through the article's assumption we know what its on about doesn't turn up anything notable or encyclopedic. Schoolcruft collective self-importance. Plutonium27 (talk) 19:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.