Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storage Affinity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 14:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Storage Affinity

Storage Affinity (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Gives no indication that this software is at all notable and, indeed, does not say much of anything. Anaxial (talk) 18:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep It's not software, it's a heuristic. G-hits seem to indicate that it receives attention, and the source checks out. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 18:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Darkspots (talk) 00:44, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete No evidence of RS coverage, amidst false positives, ghits only confirm the tool's existence, not notability per WP:WEB TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 02:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, it's real and it's been published, per User:JeremyMcCracken above , but it would not seem that it's gotten anybody's attention. Not notable really until people start talking about it. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.