Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Dail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --jonny-mt 03:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Steven Dail

Steven Dail (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Doesn't seem to be notable outside the Project 86 article. αѕєηιηє t/c 15:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep Dail is a member of two notable bands Crash Rickshaw and Project 86. I believe that constitutes notability. --Cyrus Andiron 17:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Andrew Schwab and Randy Torres have seperate articles. No one made a fuss about that. I believe Steven Dail is a useful article that should be expanded, not deleted. (Sector311) 16:15 April 2008
'Comment: WP:OSE is an invalid reason to have an article. Toddst1 (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: as unsourced BLP and WP:NN. Toddst1 (talk) 16:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep it is not invalid, someone could be trying to find out what other bands Steven Dail has been in. I'm trying to help people, not destroy the world with one article. (sector311)
  • From WP:MUSIC: Members of notable bands are not given individual articles unless they have demonstrated notability for activity independent of the band. While Project 86 seems a notable band, there is no such evidence in the article for Crash Rickshaw (and I would be in favor of an AfD for the latter article if it is not improved). Thus while Project 96 seems to meet WP:MUSIC, I don't see sufficient evidence for either Steven Dail or Crash Rickshaw. Tentative delete. Those who wish to argue otherwise are strongly urged to add otherwise omitted evidence of notability to the articles themselves rather than to here. B.Wind (talk) 02:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.