Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Termath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Steve Termath

Does this [1] look like a notable filmography to you? (i.e. "Uncredited") Vulturell 03:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Speedy Delete per nomination. Vulturell 03:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Why are you putting articles on AfD if you think they should be speedied? fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete nn bio. --Pboyd04 03:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete professional movie extra. Endomion 03:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. I reckon being listed on IMDb is sufficient to beat A7, but a largely-uncredited "professional movie extra" (as Endomion succinctly put it) isn't really notable enough for an encyclopaedic article. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 03:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Ummm... you do realize that every single actor who has ever been billed in movie credits is listed on the IMDB? Even that guy working in Pizza Hut down your block who had one line in Mean Girls? Vulturell 04:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Well, sort of. I'm sure IMDb isn't as complete as it would like to be; but quibbling aside, yes, I do appreciate this, and I appreciated it before I expressed my opinion. Presumably User:Deathphoenix does, too. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I take great fuddling offense that you presume to speak for me. I fully agree with you, however. --Deathphoenix 17:06, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, I agree this doesn't qualify for a speedy, but his filmography is definitely not terribly impressive (FYI, I'm removing the speedy tag to clear the CSD category). --Deathphoenix 04:22, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete - This actor does not appear to be noteworthy. -- (aeropagitica) UK 08:58, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable vanity biography. —Quarl (talk) 09:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete just an extra in some big movies. Doesn't establish notability. Cobra 09:20, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - Even although he is totally minor. --Kilo-Lima 16:37, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, but the IMDb link is a good enough claim of notability for me. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep a credited role is listed, which is good enough for me. CarbonCopy (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.