Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Quadros

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Anyone who feels like rewriting it should contact me to get the content. howcheng {chat} 19:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stephen Quadros

Unsourced vanity. Pilatus 06:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep but definitely needs some heavy editing so as to sound more encyclopedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fightindaman (talk • contribs)
• Delete as vanity. The article even flaunts the rules (see below). Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 07:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

NOTE: Please read thie folowing piece of obvious fluff with some degree of skepticism. Such a level of self promotion as this is, unfortunatly not entirely against the Wikipedia rules, so this page should serve as an example of what not to do.

• Keep and trim the fat. Karate chop, ha-yah! Flyboy Will 08:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as what essentially appears to be a personal advertisement for Quadros. Serious heavy editing might save this piece; however, the level of promotion (or self-promotion as the case may be) may demand an entire re-write. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.28.76.172 (talk • contribs)
• Shotei, haito, and uraken. Uh, delete this promo/vanity stuff. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• This must be deleted, it is pure BS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.51.112 (talk • contribs)
• Delete, pretty much an nn-bio. Stifle 22:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, he is a notable figure in mixed martial arts. The article needs a complete re-write though. --- Trench 02:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.