Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steffen Gielen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Steffen Gielen

Steffen Gielen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

He has published only one article. --Ephraim33 (talk) 15:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete Only two preprints in ArXiv (both joint, and not clear if either one has been published), no citations of his work yet. Clearly, not a notable academic yet and manifestly fails WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 22:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
  • delete I don't see notability following from Mayhew Prize, and don't think merging this into that will improve it either. Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Still a graduate student. The prize is to the top undergraduate student of the year in Applied Mathematics at Cambridge, many of whom probably do go on to become notable, but we have in general not considered prizes at this academic stage as notabilie in themselves. DGG (talk) 17:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.