Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stealing Share

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stealing Share

non-notable corporation Akradecki 17:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment - speedy tag removed twice, looks like a bit of sock puppetry, too, as two similar editors have worked on it, and it's the first edit for them. Akradecki 17:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment What one person defines as "non-notable" someone else may find quite notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThiefCorbin (talk • contribs)
  • Comment Sources added more sorces forth coming ThiefCorbin
    • You'll have to do better than that...neither source/reference listed say anything about the company, just about the industry in general. Akradecki 17:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete advertising. It's not quite that easy, Corbin. Gazpacho 17:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless some assertion of notability can be made (other than "we think it is"). This article reads like an ad, and a Google search for Stealing Share, inc only turns up 100 hits. RedRollerskate 17:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, Not Notable, Advert. The client list looks impressive, but unless external sources can be provided, I see it not notable. --KPWM_Spotter 18:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.