Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Bores

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mackensen (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Star Bores

• Delete. I believe the subject is not sufficiently notable to merit its own article in Wikipedia. — Mike (talk • contribs) 16:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if referenced. A real book ( [1] ) with presumably a fair number of sales (amazon.co.uk rank 100,000-ish - not JK Rowling territory, but still not negligible); however, references are essential. Tevildo 16:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki WikiBooks. Ste4k 20:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep major books should have their own article. Jedi6-(need help?) 02:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. No notability stated or implied, or documented, in this advertisement. "Major" books? This paperback ranked #769,537 on Amazon as of this date, down from #763,195 yesterday. I think we're safe from needing to argue that distinction. Tychocat 14:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless references can show that it meets the suggested criteria of WP:BK. It exists, it's from a notable publisher but I don't see any indications that it is popular, critically acclaimed or otherwise notable. Eluchil404 01:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.