Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Joseph Shrine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't see any good arguments to merge. Wizardman 18:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] St Joseph Shrine

St Joseph Shrine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Article was successfully prodded, but recreated by the original creator. Here was my prod reason: "Article reads as a promotion. The notability seems spurious and not within our guidelines. No sources are cited, no independent coverage found on google. I don't believe an article within wikipedia guidelines could be written about this topic." Andrew c ^[talk] 16:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 16:18, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete No assertion of notability, reads like an advertisement. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 22:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge with Panagudi. utcursch | talk 16:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 08:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

• Merge per utcursch. --Julesn84 (talk) 17:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure what content the above users want merged. The article has no citations. Content always needs to meet WP:V, so it's not clear what content can be sourced to reliable sources. There is also unencyclopedic content, such as the daily schedule. Perhaps I too would support a merge, if we could cite an independent source that says this place exists and is semi-notable (and if we can find enough independent sources to establish notability, then there is no need for deletion, or merger for that matter). But without basic verifiable citations, any content we merge will still be violating core wikipedia policies. -Andrew c ^[talk] 20:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.