Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Square Haven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm just not seeing any substantial coverage as per WP:WEB W.marsh 15:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Square Haven

Square Haven (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not pass WP:WEB. Alexa says its rank is >150,000 and it has less than 17,000 G-hits. I feel like, while the site itself is good, it doesn't pass notability for webpages. Axem Titanium 20:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Balloonman (talk) 06:27, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete Borderline A7 speedy. No assertions of notability. Also no independent sources seem to exist, thus fails the most basic notability requirements. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 07:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep The removal of this article would only serve to further alienate those seeking quality and quantity in regards to anything related to Square Enix. It's the most relevant site for Square Enix content on the internet -- no other resource meets its depth in regards to music, media, game information, game guides, and people data. It has been used as a reference for numerous articles on Wikipedia. Removing this article will only worsen the traffic issue rather than give this site the exposure it deserves. Wikipedia must be a quality resource. Don't disconnect Wikipedia from the quality references that feed it. Mberti (talk) 06:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

A resource can be used without it having its own Wikipedia page. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 12:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep Notability requirements are justified internally. Website is notable for, among other things, exclusive interviews with game designers, which have been validated by reliable third-party sources including Wired[1] and Kotaku[2].--Jeriaska —Preceding comment was added at 07:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

The mentions of Square Haven on those two sources are trivial. Neither of them makes any claim that Square Haven hosts exclusive interviews. They only say that Square Haven just happened to be where they read about it. Axem Titanium (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.