Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpongeBob SquarePants: Collapse!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Johnleemk | Talk 11:09, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SpongeBob SquarePants: Collapse!

Online game on Nick.com. Utterly not notable. Yes, I certainly hate Spongecruft. Haven't you noticed? --Apostrophe 07:32, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. --Aurochs (Talk | Block)
  • Strong Keep - no way in hell I am going to vote delete on 11,500 google hits on the exact term (in inverted commas no less). Can't justify a deletion I am afraid. Its very notable, obviously. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 10:00, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Comment There aren't 11,500 Google hits, there are "approximately" 11,500 Google hits. In practice this translates to just 334 unique pages. And the vast majority of those, if you actually look at them, have no meaningful content - they're just nonsense like "Jennifer irvin winnie the pooh bassinet glory foods spongebob squarepants collapse route 5 elisabeth shoe". A lot of the rest seem to be mirrors of the game itself. Looks to me like someone is trying to exploit Spongebob popularity to boost their pagerank. — Haeleth Talk 00:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ESkog | Talk 13:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. → Ξxtreme Unction {yakłblah} 19:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete- Unencyclopedic, fancrufty crap. Reyk 00:53, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, no actual evidence of any notability since Google's results are so ridiculously unreliable in this case (see my comment above). — Haeleth Talk 00:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep; it's an online game out there featuring a notable character... but the article can use massive rewriting. *Dan T.* 03:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, the google hits demonstrate that this game has found itself an audience, otherwise webmasters wouldn't be using it to attract surfers to their sites. Kappa 02:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- Dalbury(Talk) 02:38, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.