Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sperm Shark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied as vandalism. --Stormie (talk) 00:53, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sperm Shark

Sperm Shark (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This appears to be a hoax. Nominating to achieve consensus. Eliyak T·C 21:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

• Strong delete. Hoax of the worst kind: the kind that doesn't even try it with humour. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 21:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as obvious hoax. It is a copy-and-paste of Pygmy shark, with a few words changed (e.g. Euprotomicrus bispinatus changed to Euprotomicrus gametus).--Hnsampat (talk) 22:10, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete indeed, although it doesn't quite fit any of the criteria. That's why we have WP:SNOW...--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 23:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete "Euprotomicrus gametus" returns nothing on Google. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 00:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.