Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 04:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spanich

Spanich (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable neologism. First several pages of non-wiki ghits do not show the word used in this way. No sources in article to show notability. Contested prod. Fabrictramp 13:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Dicdef of a neologism. Most ghits show honest mistakes in spelling "Spanish".--Sethacus 15:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO. Maybe a redirect to Spanish would be in order? Seems to be a common misspelling ;-) --B. Wolterding 15:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete, non-notable, dare I say non-existent neologism, very likely made up. --Targeman 17:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This makes no sense whatsoever. Wikipedia is not for tings made up in school one day. James Luftan ^contribs 17:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete (and block user). User:Groovybill has recreated this page after it was deleted as Nonsense ... richi 12:09, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - sounds like something made up in school one day. I have a friend who makes up words all the time, but that doesn't mean we need articles on them on Wikipedia. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 17:08, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Yes sir, ladies and gentlemen, that's right, it's Spanich! It's Spinach, only Spanish! You'll love it, guaranteed, or your money back! ...Um, yeah. Anyway, irrelevant. Pointless. Putrid. But it sounds like a food. REMOVE ASAP -- M (^speak/_spoken) 19:32, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete complete made up nonsense. Burntsauce 22:09, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

I still think that this article is fine but thats a biased opinion. And it's not a made up word, lots of people i know use it. If you can suggest a website that will be less harsh with critiscisms about its articles please suggest it here. groovybill 03:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• I suggest www.myspace.com . --B. Wolterding 10:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Even if a lot of people use the term, it has to be used in a notable context and shown to be used outside of blogs and the Urban Dictionary, and not so new that its use is more than a fad. Sorry, dude. Bearian 02:22, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per the nomination. If the creator of this article is repeatedly generating hoax articles, this should be looked into further as well. Yamaguchi先生 01:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.