Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southern expressionism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 18:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Southern expressionism

Southern expressionism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This movement does not appear to have achieved any widespread recognition. There are only 44 google hits, including wikipedia ones.[1] Only one of the artists listed in it has their own wiki article (which does not mention the movement). The others have links to external sites, e.g. Chris Cook, where the wiki article is quoted.[2] The external links to museums do not reveal a mention of the movement. There are references given to three books, but no inline citations and no evidence the books contain any significant material about Southern expressionism. Tyrenius 03:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Tyrenius 03:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete While there are artists of note who are from the South and who are expressionists they aren't connected to this article. Modernist 03:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. No inline source citations for any of this, and at least one of the listed references at the end doesn't contain a word about this so-called "Southern Expressionism". I doubt the others do either. This is seemingly a contrived excuse to promote this Catherine Clark Ellis person. wikipediatrix 03:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom et al. For some reason I thought this would be an article filled with phrases like "Kiss my grits" and "Happier than a dog up a bone tree". --Evb-wiki 13:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - You might be a redneck if... --WebHamster 13:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Freshacconci 00:50, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete apart, perhaps, from this [3], all roads lead back to WP on the ghits, or to the German version, which could be referenced much better. Johnbod 17:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.