Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soundcircuit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 05:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Soundcircuit

Delete. Non-notable website, low Alexa ranking, possible vanity. Brendan 01:35, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Agree with the possible vanity, also "list of users and traits" is completely random, useless, unverifiable rubbish. Anyone who wants to know about this is already a member. Deiz 02:31, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB -- ShinmaWa^(talk) 02:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Informational. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.213.51.203 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

This user has less than 5 edits -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:WEB. -- Vary | Talk 03:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep While seeming like an obvious waste of time and non-sensical addition to the site it's very informative on one of the more popular hip hop message boards out there. Since its formation is has 2479158 posts and 81441 total threads and almost 10,000 people who are logged onto the site. Someone has obviously took advantage of adding things that are superfluous but it's still worth it to have a note on this website and its message board. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.162.19.91 (talk • contribs) 06:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

This user has never edited before -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.217.252 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

This user has never edited before -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per Deiz. Themusicking 19:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep dis junk. Value pack up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.87.144.67 (talk • contribs) .
• Keep One of the most well known message boards in the world, Soundcircuit is the barometer for what is raunchy and disturbing in all internet fashion. Consider this site the virtual Howard Stern of the net. The many characters and attractions to the site keep the public entertained at the speed of Jack Bauer. Ignoring its impact on society would be a grave mistake, one you may regret with your very lives...EGO 10:35, 16 January 2006 (CTU)

This account is less than 2 days old-- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• K44P —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.44.103.199 (talk • contribs) .

This user has never edited before -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

• • Opinion hasn't changed after rework and dubious unsigned opinions, vote remains as above. Deiz 23:13, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete As per criteria for speedy deletion of articles points 6 & 7. --CopperMurdoch 05:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per CSD:A7. Else delete per nom, Deiz and WP:WEB. Zunaid 08:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I can't see this meets CSD A7, since notability was asserted and is asserted above, A6 was valid but since there is an assertion of notability I have instead removed the attacks - which leaves, er, the name :-) Something tells me the closing admin is going to give lower than usual weight to some of the above comments. - Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 10:43, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WEB. I'm with JzG on this one, too. RasputinAXP _{talk contribs} 12:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, speedy as A1 no context if possible, slowly otherwise. Stifle 20:48, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.