Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonali Verma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sonali Verma

Delete. Non-notable candidate for city councillor in 2006 Toronto municipal elections. Fails to meet WP:BIO criteria. Atrian 03:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 04:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as with the previous two candidates. City council candidates are not sufficiently high profile. Geogre 12:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete City council members are not encyclopediac. Candidates even less so. Listed accomplishments may or may not add to her notability, but there are no outside sources to back up the claims. --DarkAudit 12:59, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Agree with DarkAudit. YUL89YYZ 17:46, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Being a journalist and singing with a local choir are great, but do not render one noteworthy enough for inclusion in an encyclopedia. --Skeezix1000 18:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Retain I think all challengers should be considered noteworthy. If they lose the election and do nothing else considered relevant, then their pages may be thrown into the trash heap of history. Juveboy 01:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Smerge. No need for any separate articles from Toronto municipal election, 2006. Jacqui^★ 17:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep for now since there is an article on her opponent. NPOV means we shouldn't have article on just one candidate in a race. Fluffy the Cotton Fish 13:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.