Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slade gellin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 23:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Slade gellin

Slade gellin (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Appears to fail notability. Was only able to find a small handfull of published articles, and none were particularly cited. Claims to notability aren't properly sourced.Pekaje 17:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. NN Academic. Fails to assert notability by relevant third party. Mystache 17:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NN and WP:COI. --Selket ^Talk 23:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not yet N; Only 4 papers in peer reviewed journals,, plus conference proceedings, since 1979. Associate professors are only sometimes notable; he's at a university, but not of the the very most important ones; all the papers are on the same very narrow subject. DGG 03:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I don't see any evidence that this person passes the notability test. dcandeto 22:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.