Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkyscraperCity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 09:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SkyscraperCity

SkyscraperCity (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Does not appear to meet WP:WEB. Tizio 17:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Has a nice few users, but not enough, or wide enough recognition for notability. --Jimmi Hugh 17:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No reasonable assertion of notability. Borderline spam. YechielMan 03:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, it is a major forum with a userbase of over 95,000 members. It is one of the largest forums on the net. - Erebus555 18:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 23:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as lacking detailed write-up in reliable independent sources per WP:WEB. Although a search for <SkyscraperCity> on Google News turns up 27 results, none write about the website itself in detail. [1] —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-24 23:56Z
  • Delete Not notable and almost like spam. — Wenli 01:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Spam and vanity. Sr13 (T|C) ER 05:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Agree with spam assessment. --Valley2city₪‽ 05:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no evidence of notability per WP:RS (membership numbers aren't a criterion), can reasonably be called WP:SPAM. --Kinu t/c 06:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Agree that it is not notable —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tonyrocks922 (talk • contribs) 07:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete not much outside reliable sources about it. -- lucasbfr talk 09:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.