Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkullTronX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:59, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SkullTronX

Appears to be advertising, does not provide evidence of notability. Delete unless evidence provided from Wikipedia:Reliable sources so that we may verify the contents. brenneman^(t)(c) 05:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, nn-skull. Adrian Lamo · (talk) · (mail) · 06:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Royboycrashfan 06:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. *drew 06:04, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• I've placed a "be nice" note on the other afd. We can handle this with a bit more gentleness, but with the same amount of clarity. - brenneman^(t)(c) 06:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Brenneman is, as usual, correct. ENCEPHALON 11:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. non-notable product; vanity. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-02-03 12:43Z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.