Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skooma
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to The Elder Scrolls--JForget 02:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Skooma
Non-notable fictional drug from a videogame. Merging would usually be the solution per WP:FICT, but that idea was rejected on the talk page. There was an attempt to redirect it to the main article, but that was reverted. Deletion is the next option. Masaruemoto 02:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete (or Redirect and protect the redirect). No assertion of notability, no sources, nothing that makes it notable outside of the games. TJ Spyke 02:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to the game's article (The Elder Scrolls). Protect the redirect based on previous reversion. Doczilla 03:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to The Elder Scrolls per above. (Comment: At last, an AfD that actually followed WP:FICT's guidelines of trying to merge first. *happy sigh*) —Quasirandom 04:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect --Voidvector 04:17, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete with Redirect as optional. per nom, Not even a main plot device in game. Kudos to Masaruemoto for following WP:FICT and rather than lazily slapping it in the Afd. If all fiction article nominators practice this, Afdland will be less gloomy.--Lenticel (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect as above, and if anyone feels like doing so, transwiki to the UESPWiki. --Explodicle 14:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to List of fictional medicines and drugs. —dustmite 16:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - a minor item in the whole scheme of Morrowind. Not even worth a redirect. -- Whpq 17:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- Note - it is featured in Oblivion too, slightly more prominently. --Explodicle 19:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

