Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skirling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unfortunately, the resulting page is not a valid disambiguation because none of the linked articles mention the term in any context. --Coredesat 04:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Skirling

Skirling (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

not an article RepriseRubric 16:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete. WP is not a dictionary and I can't imagine what more could be said about this term than dictionary-stuff. DMacks 17:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete per DMacks. --Djsasso 17:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete per above. It's a synonym. Thomjakobsen 18:09, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete - Wikipedia is a encyclopedia, not a dictionary. Not sure even belongs at wikitionary since this term seems like slang. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (tαlk) 19:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Zouavman Le Zouave 20:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete WP isn't a dictionary. Thats what wiktionary is for. Sasha Callahan 20:16, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete A dicdef. --Malcolmxl5 22:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not Wiktionary. RS1900 05:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. I've moved the definitions to wikt:skirling; its now a valid dab page. John Vandenberg 07:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.