Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sipahh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 15:50, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sipahh

Sipahh (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Advertisement with no claim of meeting WP:Notability. WP:COI issues. Contested prod. Fabrictramp 15:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable. Shouldn't it be speedy for advertising? -- Mikeblas 15:34, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• This page should be more informative, how it works what it is, it does seem more like an ad at present. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wdaloz (talk • contribs) 19:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep About 70 Google News hits. Some of the articles are just brief mentions, but there are articles about a lawsuit against Nestle [1] and the straw's manufacturer winning a Food Industry Innovation Award [2]. This says more than 14 million straws have been sold. There are also articles in other languages. I'll add some sources to the article. Bláthnaid 19:56, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless citations from reliable sources are provided to comply with the verifiability policy and fully establish notability. Stifle (talk) 21:09, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep This article is about a notable product. I see no reason to delete it other than it may be perceived as an advertisement. With some minor adjustments it could be written like an article. Wikipedia and the world aren't about moving backwards and getting rid of things that aren't quite right, we should be moving forward and if you feel strongly enough about an article to put it up for AfD when it is about a notable product, why can't you try and fix it up a little? I know that I will try. Charlie.somerville 07:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
• Keep A notable product which is now distributed alongside milk at McDonald's restaurants. Should never have even been considered for deletion in the first place.Curlingpro47 23:57, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.