Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Pinnington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete Simon Pinnington and redirect The Way of the Cross to Stations of the Cross -- Samir धर्म 05:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Simon Pinnington and The Way of the Cross

A composer who fails the notability test. Apparently, "His music is self-published," he has no allmusic.com listing, less than than 700 Google hits including WP and mirrors, and it smells like vanity, being written by Pinners (talk · contribs). I've included The Way of the Cross in this listing, one of his compositions, which is "currently in progress". Dmcdevit·t 02:35, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:BIO and WP:VAIN. As nom mentioned, only 638 Google results [1]--☆TBC☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 02:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete him per above. Redirect the other to Stations of the Cross as Way of the Cross does. Fan1967 02:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Madman 03:04, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete first, redirect second per nom and Fan1967. Paddles ^T_C 08:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 20:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep both notable. Composer of music not intended to be popular Fg2 13:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Question. How can an uncompleted composition be notable? Fan1967 18:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• No Opinion on the first. Redirect on the second. Works in progress are generally non-notable and/or unverifyable, see WP:NOT. Eluchil404 19:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.