Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silkroute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete and redirect. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 04:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Silkroute

Delete as un-encyclopaedic. Originally created as an advert for a non-notable company, now just a place holder for a link to a (commercial?) web site that has no content. blue520 12:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as what appears to be a walled garden. Yanksox 12:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• What about redirect to Silk Road? --Ioannes Pragensis 19:44, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• redirect to Silk Road Ramseystreet 21:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. SM247^{My Talk} 01:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• External link removed (there used to be a website there). Silkroute 11:48, 3 July 2006 (GMT)
• First page was created from an email recieved from one of the companies named SilkRoute. Will start up a different research if all this is an issue for everyone. My first wikipedia experience :( Silkroute 11:59, 3 July 2006 (GMT)
• Redirect per above. --Ezeu 21:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.