Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Short words

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 04:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Short words

Is this a real page?? I see just link to Wikipedia articles that I think would be more appropriate for a list than a dis-ambiguation page. Delete if no one can see its consistency with general dis-ambiguation pages. Georgia guy 22:43, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

• ""Delete"" This page is just two links to other wikipedia articals. It offeres no information by itself, and is basically a page that links to another page. YK 22:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't think Wikipedia needs an article for short words...so to me, it's not really encyclopedic. Copysan 02:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - one of those pages that just makes you go "huh?" -Jcbarr 04:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Deleteper YK -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 09:24, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Mushin^talk 17:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Copysan -- Krash 19:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not really even appropiate for the Wikipedia. More for the Wikitionary ComputerJoe 20:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Please note that this article contains editing history that was merged into other articles. Uncle G 02:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.