Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shlobosenkosi Zulu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge with Goodwill_Zwelethini_kaBhekuzulu. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:55, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Shlobosenkosi Zulu
Weak Delete (Merge and redirect as per Hall Monitor) The only claim of notability that the article makes is being 36th in line of succession to the Zulu throne. If he were a European royal, I'd be recommending a strong delete for someone so far down the line of succession, but since the Zulu crown has a bit more political respect than the usual European monarch, I'm willing to concede the possibility that someone that far down the line of succession might be notable in the context of South Africa. Caerwine 18:38, 29 September 2005 (UTC) (Revised vote Caerwine 21:42, 30 September 2005 (UTC)}
- Keep: son of the current king (even if the king has got 26 older children, some of whom already have heirs). ~ Veledan • Talk + new 22:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
DeleteMerge and redirect to Goodwill_Zwelethini_kaBhekuzulu#Children - Being in-line to be head-of-state, might make somebody notable, but that's not the case here.. So, being the Zulu King's son conveys less notability than would the son of, say, Saudia Arabia's King. If he runs for any high office, holds any signficant elected office (even local), or plays any signficant political role in his community, I'll happily support an article. I am very open to changing my vote if there's some press coverage of him (beyond just stating is his school attendance), or some evidence of something he's personally done. So far, I don't see it. --rob 22:22, 29 September 2005 (UTC)- Merge and redirect to Goodwill_Zwelethini_kaBhekuzulu#Children. Hall Monitor 23:39, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.

