Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaheed Agha Ziauddin Rizvi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Coredesat 03:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shaheed Agha Ziauddin Rizvi

Shaheed Agha Ziauddin Rizvi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

vanity piece-this reads halfway between advert and religious tract Chris 10:23, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong Delete Completely non-notable, no sources. This article is more a religious attack than anything else. Faithlessthewonderboy 10:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete : religious tract is right. –SESmith 10:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per nom & al. --Targeman 12:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom Harlowraman 14:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • strong keep with a suggestion - the creator of the article, Abulfazl, has actually created quite a lot of articles about topics in the Pakistan/Afghanistan area. However, as far as this article is concerned, someone came along after June 2007, deleted all Abulfazl's content, and replaced it with the non-encyclopedic mess you see today. I'd like to suggest that, if you all agree, we revert this article back to [June 5 edit], and try discussing that instead. That old revision, while not written in perfect English, is at least attributed and a serious attempt to start an encyclopedic article. However, I won't revert without your agreement. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 15:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • reply I say it's worth reverting, knowing that, and see where that takes us. Chris 18:51, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • NOTE - OK, it has now been reverted, from the political creed back to what was a half-decent starter article on a person who was probably notable in his land. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 23:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • comment-better, but hard to read-can someone familiar with the subject clean it up? Chris 00:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
fixed up the language a bit more. It's not a great article, but considering it's on an Afghan, I'm happy that we have something. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 01:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I've also tightened it a little, added it to two WikiProjects and salvaged the picture from the delete-worthy version. All are invited to revisit and adjust votes if they feel necessary. I change my vote to keep in this restored condition, and hope someone will watch it. Chris 03:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.