Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadowleggy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Davewild (talk) 14:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shadowleggy

Shadowleggy (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability - I can't find any independent, reliable sources about this person (her own website is not an independent source of information because she wrote it) greenrd 02:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep – In its present state, I would have also nominated for deletion. However, I believe an article can be done on this subject. In just a quick Google search it shows over 400,000 hits for Resident Evil Numa [1] when the search criteria of Shadowleggy is added [2] you are still looking at over 50,000 hits. I would stubify and put a request out to editors to help improve article rather than delete article. Shoessss |  Chat  02:49, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable outside blogosphere. --DAJF 03:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless reliable third-party published sources can be found, per WP:WEB. —David Eppstein 03:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Da Englisch nicht scheint zu arbeiten, ist unten ein Reposting einiger Aufstellungsorte, die das Thema des Artikels beziehen. [3]

[4]. [5].

A translation of above is, Since English does not seem to work, below is a reposting of several sites referencing the article’s subject.Shoessss |  Chat  03:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Thanks, but the "top video clips" one doesn't count as a published source, I think. And if you search Google Scholar and Google News for "Resident Evil Numa" as a phrase rather than as words that might be far apart in the document, nothing comes up, nor do they find anything for "Shadowleggy". —David Eppstein 07:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Per User:David Eppstein above. Would require some excellent sources to be found, then I'd change my !vote per WP:HEY. - Rjd0060 05:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: Not on the level of Youtube Celebrities. Burzmali 13:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.