Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sethtoberfest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sethtoberfest

Sethtoberfest (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable. Just 7 Google hits, 6 of which are from the same site. Jvhertum 14:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - checked Google search and agree: non-notable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HagenUK (talk • contribs) 16:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC).
  • Sorry! Forgot to include the "four tildes": HagenUK 21:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Non-notable. S.D. ¿п? § 18:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable, possible hoax. Edeans 22:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube 23:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Can I ask why the quantity of google results is the measure of a subject's "notability"? This is admittedly an obscure entry, but if obscurity constitutes grounds for deletion, is the implication that something needs to be already known in order to give it the chance to be made known?--Grampa 07:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Take a look at the guideline on notability and policy on verifiability. We need reliable independent sources to verify the article, and right now those don't appear to exist. —Celithemis 14:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.