Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sepultura's 11th Studio Album

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sepultura's 11th Studio Album

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Sepultura's 11th Studio Album
Sepultura's 11th Studio Album (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Uncertain future album, WP:CRYSTAL Dougie WII (talk) 06:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - Few sources, mostly OR, WP:CRYSTAL. Zouavman Le Zouave 06:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - I recall this being nominated a while back (sorry, I can't find the AFD), and the result was delete then. IE - recreation of previously deleted material. Lugnuts (talk) 08:24, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 08:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, WP:CRYSTAL and recreation of previously deleted material. Lankiveil (talk) 11:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC).
  • Strong Keep, all this information can be found online or in interviews w/ magazines such as Revolver, people! It's not a crystal ball! It's even listed on the band's Myspace that a new album is coming out. This thing needs a page. How can we improve it if there isn't a page to improve? The article should stay.

Dark Executioner (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner

  • Comment There are really no facts even asserted that have to do with this album, all the info in the article is about the band which is already covered in Sepultura. -- Dougie WII (talk) 20:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, recreate under the proper title (when we know it), with the proper titles (when we know them) and with sources (when we have any). tomasz. 18:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment. And this is indeed speediable per Lugnuts' comment above. tomasz. 18:05, 1 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.