Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SeahawksHuddle.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 23:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SeahawksHuddle.com

nn fansite. Alexa rank of 630,857, and a forum with only 673 users. Fails to meet WP:WEB -^demon[yell at me][ubx_war_sux] /19:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Plus, author of page attacked Yanksox in revision 57594235. — Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 21:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Wow...I didn't notice that. One, I'm a dude and two, I have a girlfriend. I attract alot of vandalism hate considering I try to be pretty civil. Yanksox 21:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

How is deleting people's article's "civil"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattlehawk94 (talk • contribs) 17:41, June 8, 2006

Articles that have no meaningful content or are non-notable are deleted. See Template:Nn-warn for more info. — Super-Magician (talk • contribs • count) ★ 21:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Civil being that I try to act in a peaceful manner since it really is what every person on earth deserves. However, Wikipedia has rules to follow. The page you listed fails WP:WEB and under WP:NOT, it's promotion. Don't worry about this AfD, if you spend your time towards promoting your site and make it like this a Wikipedia article is the last think you'll care about. Yanksox 21:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per all the above. Kukini 21:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Not my site. Don't own, don't have really anything to do but post there. Not for promotion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattlehawk94 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 8 June 2006

Well, you can take the glory. It doesn't matter if it's yours or not. If I wore Pepsi everything and talked about how awesome Pepsi was and how it cured cancer, I would be promoting. Even if that wasn't my intent. Yanksox 21:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Also, Seattlehawk94, this may come as a huge shock to you, but when you call other users "dumb skank whores", that doesn't actually make anyone more sympathetic to your plight. Amazing, I know, but that's just one more way the world is unfair. -- Captain Disdain 21:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

How do luminaries such as Paula Marshall get pages? Is she "meaningful content or notable?" Hell, half the pages on here are about no name actors. How the hell are they "notable"?promotion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Seattlehawk94 (talk • contribs) 21:58, 8 June 2006

True, there are some actors that aren't notable, recently we had a massive purging of ALOT of non-notable actors. But the reason for notability is sometimes judged upon coverage. Aslo, Paula Marshall has stories on her and has been on many TV shows. That sort of makes you notable. Yanksox 22:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Perhaps you would care to take a look at the Five Pillars of Wikipedia, Seattlehawk94? It explains the reasoning behind a the way we do things. Also, please sign your messages by typing four tildes, like so: ~~~~ -- that makes it easier to see who said what and when. -- Captain Disdain 22:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete why isn't Seattlehawk94 banned for WP:PA? Danny Lilithborne 01:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and sanction Someone just isn't in the Wikipedia spirit. Ace of Sevens 06:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete clearly not notable enough DrunkenSmurf 17:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable. Go Eagles! Oh wait, the game is over. Cheers --Starionwolf 23:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.