Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SeaGreen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:47, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] SeaGreen

SeaGreen (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails notability requirements for inclusion, likely promotional. slakr^\ talk / 04:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to Sea green. Corvus cornix_talk 04:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete due to being almost entirely promotional. It reads almost exactly like their website. --Ig8887 (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, likely CSD G11 candidate. Jfire (talk) 07:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable software that has apparently just been released. Article appears to be promotional. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 19:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 23:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Retain. While it is true that Seagreen is new, it is notable in the respect that it is the first software to present professional-level developers with the opportunity to create online forms & automatic database creation, without using online services. Product is significant in that, until this point, this service has largely been monopolized by online providers. Seagreen is a "DIY" software, friendly to web developers who are not familiar with coding. In fact, untried, untested, and unknown products such as Zune and iPhone (remember how it was kept under wraps?) were most certainly featured in Wikipedia prior to release. Suggestions are most welcomed as to how to redevelop article to satisfy Wikipedia conditions and ensure life of this article. Thank you. --TulipCat (talk) 01:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • How does it meet WP:N? JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 01:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • User:TulipCat is the creator of the article. Corvus cornix_talk 22:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
• Retain. Internet communities such as Wikipedia are supposed to level the playing field. This company may not have the deep pockets of Microsoft or Adobe, but just because the software is new, doesn't necessarily mean it is "not-notable." I suggest we provide feedback on how to make the article less "promotional." Iwebbed (talk) 16:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
  • — Iwebbed (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Corvus cornix_talk 22:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia is an encylcopedia, not a source for "leveling the playing field." We're not here for free advertising. Corvus cornix_talk 22:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - no reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.