Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scribblesmeeting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article is original research. Davewild (talk) 19:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Scribblesmeeting

Scribblesmeeting (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Seems like original research. A Google search turns up practically nothing. Had I seen it earlier I would have nominated it for speedy deletion. LittleOldMe (talk) 12:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete. Really could probably have just been speedied. Reads almost like a test/scratch or "scribble" page. Cirt (talk) 18:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. I can't find any speedy deletion criteria that this fits; it doesn't read like a test page to me, but that's the only criterion that comes close. AnturiaethwrTalk 18:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete either spam or a how-to (and in any case it's basically all original research). Either way it has no place in Wikipedia Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 13:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.