Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scramels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. - Bobet 22:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scramels

Apparent nonsense/hoax and prodded as such, but prod removed quickly by different user to author (author Scramel, deprodder Scraz - mysteriously coming out of a 3 month Wikipedia hiatus within one minute of the prod to do so...). May be speedyable as reposted content from the previously deleted and protected nonsense/hoax article Scramel. ~Matticus ^T_C 19:53, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unless somebody can cite a source or something. Otherwise, I think this is probably Original Research or a hoax. Get rid of. Allisonmontgomery69 22:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete does not make sense. Danny Lilithborne 23:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• scramel can be found on the list of legendary creatures. This proves it is known by others than myself. user:scramel defendant of this artcle
  • You mean the entry added by you posing as an anon? Sure. Danny Lilithborne 19:35, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
    • actually twas me, I am from Wiltshire and have been trying to get Scramels on Wikipedia as well. it may not be known by you city slickers but it is common enough to be added —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freddiedaw (talk • contribs)
      • Above user's only edits have to do with keeping "scramels". Danny Lilithborne 20:00, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.