Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scourge (Warcraft)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Tikiwont (talk) 09:50, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scourge (Warcraft)

Scourge (Warcraft) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Poorly sourced, unnotable fancruft with plot summaries.

Out of the sources, five came from the Blizzard website, one came from the manual, and two came from Wikipedia itself. Obviously, referencing Wikipedia as a source on Wikipedia is not acceptable.

Along with that, there are no third-party sources to establish its notability. Readers who do not play the Warcraft series would have little to no interest in this.

It contains gamecruft which is a likely attractor to original research, something unwelcome to Wikipedia.

There are plot summaries in the article, which is what Wikipedia is not. There are many problems to note that usually do not belong. IAmSasori 15:07, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect WoWWiki is a Wikia project now. Redirect this entry to it instead, if possible.--Silverhand^Talk 16:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Delete - Zero notability on its own, so it shouldn't have its own article. Judgesurreal777 22:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No out-of-universe perspective, no real-world notabiliy. Pagrashtak 16:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Collectonian (talk) 19:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Pagrashtak 16:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.