Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sassas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sassas

Sassas (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't appear to be a notable organisation. No sources, or hint of them on google. Contested prod. MER-C 04:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

• Super duper delete Wow, these folks had the audacity to link to Youtube and Myspace! Ha ha. YechielMan 02:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The nom's assertion is incorrect. "Society for the Activation of Social Space through Art and Sound" on Google has plenty of hits. John Vandenberg 09:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep if fully sourced. perhaps the Reliable reviews and other sources should be examined to see if there are some selected ones that can go on the page itself. DGG 01:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep --Remi 01:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: And your reasoning would be... ? --Kinu ^t/_c 02:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Agree that it needs to be sourced, but we have loads of otherwise serviceable articles that need citations. Dppowell 03:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, but needs to be better sourced. MySpace and YouTube are not reliable sources. Sr13 (T|C) ^ER 03:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep but please rename the article SASSAS or, better yet, the full name of the organization. Of course, the article could be cleaned up as well. mako (talk•contribs) 17:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep the review external link convinced me they are notable. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment So far I see alot of Keep "if sourced". Well, these are Delete "as is" votes. NeoFreak 22:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails the mandatory inclusion policies of both attribution and notability. NeoFreak 22:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.