Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sainthood of all believers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sainthood of all believers
The name of the iarticle is self explanitory and there is no need for this article to exist. Any explination that could possibly be given here would amount to "All people who believe this are Saints" which is self referential and has no useful information. Any article which links to this one can be fixed with 1/2 a sentence if it needs any change at all. Kode 00:18, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete concept adequately covered at Saint —Wahoofive (talk) 01:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom, above. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 03:37, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to Saint#Protestantism. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 04:09Z
- Merge Segv11 (talk/contribs) 04:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Phædriel *whistle* 10:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC
- Delete as per nomination. -- Kjkolb 13:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. The article is just plain wrong. This is actually something I know something about (sorry, just a rare moment)! The author seems to be thinking about either the Priesthood of all believers, which is already covered, or the New Testament usage of the word translated as "saint" (hagios) which would draw the 'Pedia into the non-NPOV pit of textual interpretation. --KJPurscell 15:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete actually it wouldn't draw us into POV, hagios=saint=believer in the New Testament - that isn't really contravertial, and we can (and do) also neutrally record different views of how the modern church uses the word. But all this is in Saint - this article as nothing new to offer, and is, as you say, a little confused. --Doc ask? 02:22, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- delete per KJPurscell -- Krash 14:09, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

