Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SUN study

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (o rly?) 15:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] SUN study

SUN study (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:COI: This article was created by a person affiliated with this study (see Bes-Rastrollo M, Pe´rez Valdivieso JR, Sa´nchez-Villegas A, Alonso A, Martı´nez-Gonza´ lez MA. Validacio´n del peso e ı´ndice de masa corporal auto-declarados de los participantes de una cohorte de graduados universitarios. Rev Esp Obes 2005;3:183–89), User:Jrpvaldi = Jose Ramon Perez Valdivieso. There are many important epidemiological studies in the world, and independent Wikipedia editors should be deciding which ones are notable and how to describe them. Macrakis 18:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Modestly, my contribution to the SUN study was very little and this article is not an important one.--Jose Ramon Perez Valdivieso 22:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 10:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete - leaving aside the COI issues (which I don't see as significant in this case), there are no third-party external sources to establish notability. Delete unless further sources are added by the end of this AfD. Walton monarchist89 10:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:RS--Sefringle 06:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Do not delete. The external sources can be founded in Pubmed. This study may be compared to Nurses' Health Study. It is of interest, and adds knowledge to Wikipedia. --Arturico 13:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Please provide evidence from Pubmed or SCI that this study is cited by other authors. Thanks. --Macrakis 13:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.