Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rpoints

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 01:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rpoints

Rpoints (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability not established or sourced per WP:WEB.RJASE1 Talk 01:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. No sources. Abeg92contribs 02:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. YechielMan 07:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete- Not notable enough. With or without external links. See WP:WEB. Retiono Virginian 16:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete- not notable--Joebengo 17:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - Same reason as mentioned on the AfD Quidco page. Both sites cover same subject, same size, same profile in the media. It should stay if Quidco article stays, go if it goes. Identz 02:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge into Cashback Websites. --Mary quite contrary (hai?) 20:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Why should large organisations, such as Microsoft, Google and many other companies be allowed an information page at Wikipedia whilst smaller companies - such as Rpoints are not? If you want to merge articles about all cashback sites, why not merge all the articles on operating systems, and hotel companies, and the list goes on! Bruce 12:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
WP:NOTABILITY. Otherwise, under your reasoning, my cat could have her own article. --Mary quite contrary (hai?) 18:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep see AfD Quidco Supposed 14:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. no independent refs to discuss importance. wikipedia is not yellow Pages nor who is who. Mukadderat 16:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Although I just cleaned-up and wikified the article, it still is just plain non-notable. The only available references are self-referential, wikimirror, obvious (WP:COI) partners, forums and blogs. Jerry 21:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.