Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Plantation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 23:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Royal Plantation
Article was PROD'ed for lack of notability, but contested since article asserted notability stating that it received various awards and recognitions, although only reference is the article's website. So discussion is brought here. Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 23:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - it appears to be an ad and appears to have copy violoations too. --BlindEagletalk~contribs 15:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I think the article is too small to be considered an advertisement, since stubs generally include the most common information of the subject in two to five sentences. It has one weasel word, but again, its just a 5 sentence paragraph. About the copyvio, can you elaborate? I didn't see anything worrisome at first glance of the article or the webpage provided. My main concern is notability, whether or not those awards and recognitions check out. - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 16:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Reply. Perhaps I read it too quickly. I usually focus on the numbers and sentences around them that get copied into articles. In that regard, there appears to be no copy violoations. But, honestly, it still reads like a quick promo ad. Perhaps it's just a summary of the home page of the resort. However, to me, that would still qualify as as an advertisement. You're right, the place truly isn't noteworthy either. --BlindEagletalk~contribs 16:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I think the article is too small to be considered an advertisement, since stubs generally include the most common information of the subject in two to five sentences. It has one weasel word, but again, its just a 5 sentence paragraph. About the copyvio, can you elaborate? I didn't see anything worrisome at first glance of the article or the webpage provided. My main concern is notability, whether or not those awards and recognitions check out. - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 16:42, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
