Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotten tomatoes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Rotten Tomatoes. Spike Wilbury 18:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rotten tomatoes
A strange little stub, full of original research (note the weird cheese reference) and totally unsourced it also contains information regarding the website that is orthogonal to the article's content and despite the fact that there is already a Rotten Tomatoes website article. I can't help thinking that this may be a bad joke. My deletion tag was removed so here we are. Bigdaddy1981 04:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Merge to the Rotten Tomatoes website page. That page also mentions the usage of rotten tomatoes to throw at awful performers. It's surprising that the case sensitivity hasn't been sorted out by such a prominent article.--Kylohk 09:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Rotten Tomatoes, which explains the origin of the term in its first paragraph. This article offers nothing worth merging, especially since it's unreferenced. Propaniac 16:26, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- throw tomatoes at it! it's useless, and better suited for Wiktionary. Whsitchy 16:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Tomato#Modern_uses_of_tomatoes.--Svetovid 17:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Rotten Tomatoes and add a dablink on that article to point to Tomato#Modern uses of tomatoes. Or vice versa. Or disambig. --- RockMFR 20:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete content and redirect I quote from the article: "People threw tomatoes possibly because they were once thought to be poisonous". Ay ay ay. Unverified WP:BOLLOCKS. ŞůṜīΣϹ98¹Speak 12:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into Tomato, it doesn't warrant its own article, but this information could be captured in Tomato with a redirect to the subsection. Clerks. 15:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

