Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosanna Squitti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rosanna Squitti

Rosanna Squitti (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The subject of the article is a published medical researcher. However, she does not seem to have been the subject of significant third-party coverage from published reliable sources, and therefore does not seem to pass the WP:NOTABILITY criteria. Karada 12:30, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 14:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable researcher with no reliable sources. Creator of article is a relative so possible WP:COI. --Djsasso 16:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per Djsasso --Crusio 18:47, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Scientists are judged on their science, as judged by their peers. In this case I cannot tell the notability of the position, so looking at the articles in Web of Science, I find 32 peer-reviewed articles The most cited one has been cited 38 times. (then 18, 16, 12). In some subjects this might be reasonably impressive, but not experimental medicine. Her work is not yet notable. DGG (talk) 03:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.